SIP vs WebRTC for AI voice agents


SIP reaches every phone number on earth; WebRTC reaches every browser. A production voice agent needs both — here is how they fit together.
Every AI voice agent eventually has to answer a real phone. That means SIP — the protocol carriers, PBXs, and desk phones speak. But your web and mobile apps speak WebRTC. The question is not which one to pick; it is where to bridge them.
SIP: the phone network’s API
SIP carries calls between carriers, trunks, and devices. It is how a call to a phone number reaches your agent, and how your agent transfers a caller to a person. You get numbers, porting, STIR/SHAKEN, and E911 — and decades of interoperability.
WebRTC: the browser’s media stack
WebRTC gives browsers and apps encrypted, low-latency audio and video with built-in echo cancellation and NAT traversal. It is ideal for softphones, in-app calling, and conferences.
Bridge once, at the gateway
DialPress anchors media at the gateway and bridges WebRTC and SIP there, so the agent sees one call no matter where it came from. Your code handles a single INVITE; the gateway handles codecs, ICE, and DTLS-SRTP.
What that means for latency
Bridging at the edge — next to the speech engine and the agent — keeps the media path short. Every hop you remove is time back in the turn-taking budget, which is what makes an agent feel human.
Field notes
Keep reading
Build an AI voice bot like an Express app
The dialpress Node SDK turns SIP into routes and handlers. Here is a PBX and an AI voice bot that share one gateway — and pass calls between them.

Giving voice agents tools with MCP
Your booking system, your CRM, your order lookup — any API can become a voice agent’s tool without writing a line of agent code.

Why voice AI needs its own stack
A voice agent is only as good as the call it rides on. Why we built the SIP server, media path, speech, and agent runtime as one stack.
